- 1. [CQ-Contest] Contesting via remotes... (score: 1)
- Author: Lloyd Cabral <kh6lc@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 12:09:10 -1000
- We have to remember that remote HF stations have been around in one form or another for quite a long time. Early on the control, keying and audio was accomplished via the twisted pair. Later, VHF and
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00081.html (8,074 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting via remotes... (score: 1)
- Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 11:31:41 +1000
- Well said Lloyd. We are members of a technologist hobby and quite frankly some of our kin have turned into luddites as they age . When they passed there exams they were embarking on a learning proces
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00084.html (9,520 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting via remotes... (score: 1)
- Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 21:30:56 -0500
- The CQ WW contest did not disallow decoders. The change was that use of CW decoders placed an entry in the Assisted category rather than single operator. Randy, K5ZD _________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00086.html (10,945 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu