Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contesting\s+On\s+Line\s+\-\s+Used\s+to\s+be\s+Rookie\s+Roundup\s+Scoring\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:53:31 -0500
The problem with this statement: "Nope - no nefarious or ulterior motives. Just an opportunity to create a new contest for our newest contesters in a way that is more aligned with their backgrounds w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00165.html (7,912 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:45:44 -0700
I missed the part where it says that contest sponsors must openly discuss their plans with the entire world. Once again if you don't like the rules don't operate or send in a log. Very very simple. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00166.html (10,535 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:27:52 -0800 (PST)
Suppose an unforseen quasi-emergency or needed family get together occur the last 30 minutes of the contest, and the whole ordeal lasts 45 minutes. Should I then not be allowed to submit a log becaus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00171.html (8,692 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:28:46 -0800 (PST)
So we should ignore anyone over 30 who might want to get interested in 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00172.html (7,750 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:16:38 -0800 (PST)
I will not send a log in for any contest with a ridiculous deadline like this. If others feel the same, it might just reduce contest participation instead of increasing it. 73s John AA5JG ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00173.html (12,209 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:06:13 -0600
Agreed, Give at least 24 hours? Oh well,, I guess I'm in the minority on most of this. I see at least in my home situation here that if something like this happens across all contests I guess my days
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00176.html (10,672 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:20:25 -0800
Boy, if I were you, I DEFINATELY WOULD NOT enter this contest. The stress level would probably be too much to handle :-) 73 Tom WWHY Suppose an unforseen quasi-emergency or needed family get together
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00179.html (8,829 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:43:12 -0600
I don't have any complaints about the RR contest rules. But a 10 minute rule won't work for VHF contests that have a Portable and Rover class. A lot of the Rovers and Portables don't even get home ti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00180.html (11,992 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu