Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Radios\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Radios\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:31:10 -0500; Something is starting to concern me that maybe you more experienced guys can help me on. I have been asking around lately about the FT-1000 and FT-1000D radios, because I noticed a reduction in price; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00066.html (7,644 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:24:47 +0100; Bob, As Dayton approached this year I was considering buying a Field. Then I woke up and realized that they're no longer available since Yaesu is now marketing the 2000. I had the good fortune to fin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00077.html (11,298 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "Guy Molinari" <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:18:22 +0000; The Elecraft K2/100. You can easily buy 2 K2/100's fully loaded for what you would pay for an Orion. Probably with 2 Dunestar automatic bandpass filters as well. 73 - Guy, N7ZG ______________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00078.html (9,176 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:09:33 -0000; Hi Mark, A couple of questions here: 1. I don't quite follow you. You say you didn't get a Field because they are no longer available, because they have been replaced with the FT2000. Then you buy a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00083.html (13,316 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:36:34 -0500 (CDT); I own an 850 and I have used an FT1000MP owned by my fellow contester NO9Z. The 1000MP has more features but they are both great contesting radios. I love the 850 and consider it the most "bang for t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00097.html (8,405 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <w5td@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:59:13 -0000; Hi Mark, OK, got you now. I did have a FT1000MP for a little while, and it was a nice radio also. I am sure that the FT1000 is even better. Would like to try a TS850 sometime, but won't fit in the st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00098.html (17,517 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: Scott Manthe <n9aa@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:07:29 -0500; Your reasoning is interesting. Since Yaesu doesn't make the Field anymore, you decided to go for a rig a generation older for more money? The FT-1000 is a great rig and I'd probably even pay $2K for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00100.html (9,210 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "Samir Popaja" <Samir.Popaja@impact-europe.se>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:39:12 +0200; OK. We all know that K2 is nice radio for cw contesting. How this radio is good for SSB contesting? -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00115.html (10,340 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: "Guy Molinari" <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 11:48:18 +0000; Good point. I agree. From my experience the K2 falls short on transmit audio. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00117.html (11,577 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: k2onp@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:15:12 -0400; Hello John, One radio which wasn't mentioned which is really worth looking at is the ICOM IC-765. Its advantages are a crush-proof front end and REALLY large knobs, which (in contrast to the '850) ma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00126.html (19,528 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:55:04 -0400; I use a pair of K2/100's. The problem with ssb tx audio compared to most other contest radios is that the K2 doesn't have a RF-level speech compressor, only one acting on the mic input (audio level); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00128.html (10,014 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: Sherman Banks <w4atl@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:03:35 -0400; The K2 can be built for various SSB bandwidths. You can pretty much taylor the audio to how you like it to sound. My problem with it is that the Heil Pro Headset with the HC-4 element cannot drive it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00131.html (8,628 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Contest Radios (score: 1): Author: Tom Taormina <tom@k5rc.cc>; Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:18:02 -0700; I did not mean to minimize the capabilities of the K3, but almost any contester can sit down in front of an MP (or 2000) and not have a long learning curve. In the 70's, I had S-Lines and Drake C Lin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00086.html (8,355 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]