Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+QSLing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+QSLing\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ab0mv@ix.netcom.com (AB0MV); Date: Wed May 2 19:05:31 2001; Several months ago, I sent out quite a bunch of QSL cards to US contestor contacts, all with SASE's and half with pre-printed QSL cards that only required a signature from the contestor. Since moving; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00025.html (8,048 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed May 2 23:24:38 2001; "So far the response has been 10-20%. This is PATHETIC!" Well, it is pathetic, but understandable. A good contest weekend can yield 500-2000 QSOs. Let's see... 1,000 Qs X ($0.25 for the card + $0.34; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00033.html (8,306 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: rpechie@snet.net (Dick Pechie - KB1H); Date: Thu May 3 07:17:54 2001; Hi Merri - Hoping not to be one of the "guilty" non-qslers, I checked my pile. Yes, I have your SASE. You QSLed our QSO and I am waiting for new NZ1U cards to come from the printers. Ordered 2000 car; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00037.html (9,647 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: k4sb@akorn.net (Ed); Date: Thu May 3 21:13:43 2001; I must agree with Merri on this point. But as far as problems with DX QSLing, I submit you have probably never attempted to get a card from 5A1A. I have worked this stations 6 times on CW in the last; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00045.html (8,404 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Thu May 3 21:23:25 2001; "The ARRL has been working on this a LONG time (ask Wanye N7NG). It's not going to just happen overnight because every member asked." Several observations: 1) The ARRL wants to control the QSL proces; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00057.html (9,547 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri May 4 04:07:44 2001; The whole E-QSL thing aside, what I would like to see is the ARRL granting award credit for any contest QSO that is verified through receipt of BOTH logs. Once the Cabrillo files for both are on thei; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00062.html (8,844 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: JKleinhaus@etcny.com (J.P. Kleinhaus); Date: Fri May 4 11:21:00 2001; FYI: The proper URL for eQSL is http://www.eqsl.cc *not* eqsl.com which is actually a limousine service (go figure). 73, J.P. W2XX +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- J.P. Klei; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00068.html (8,650 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: robert.n.shapiro@att.net (Rob Shapiro - ND3A); Date: Fri May 4 17:54:49 2001; Pete, I'd love to see your proposal be seriously explored but would like to play devil's advocate. If Station A claims a contact Station B in a contest, and both stations have submitted Cabrillo file; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00071.html (10,191 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Sat May 5 01:01:27 2001; Hmmm, then obviously you haven't seen the VL0LD QSLs from <http://www.eQSL.cc>www.eQSL.cc for six meters that are signed by Romeo! In its current incarnation it is quite insecure. I'm a security guy; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00072.html (8,819 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri May 4 22:36:19 2001; Merri and others It is important to many to receive paper QSLs with postage or routed through buros. I understand. It is important to me to get an eQSL. Why is it that those who want paper are lauded; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00074.html (8,685 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun May 6 17:24:47 2001; Hi Rob -- Don't see why not. In fact, the independent site www.eqsl.cc seems to have a pretty well-evolved system that uses a date match only. The special case of a time mismatch resulting in a date; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00080.html (10,106 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Contest QSLing (score: 1): Author: K4WW@aol.com (K4WW@aol.com); Date: Sun May 6 19:18:10 2001; The QSL images (that pretty pictures boys and girls) that you so eloquently describe, that I receive via bureau or direct are no more "secure" than an eQSL! Not only am I taking someone's word for th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00082.html (8,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]