Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\-Preferred\s+Segments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\-Preferred\s+Segments\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1): Author: "DL8WPX" <joerg@dl8wpx.de>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:08:48 +0200; Folks, Thank you very much for the WAEDC discussion so far. I'm delighted that we finally have unearthed something laying around unattended for a while. Looking thru my mails I see many opinions voic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00320.html (11,205 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1): Author: K1AR@aol.com; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:24:17 EDT; All, After reading all of the mail on this subject, here is my take: 1) There are a bunch of unenforceable, uncoordinated band plan recommendations in place. 2) No one is going to observe them in thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00323.html (12,286 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1): Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:38:51 +0000; Because there STILL aren't enough sunspots! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00324.html (7,372 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@5b4agn.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:06:57 +0000; The difficulty I have with this, is that WAE 2009 Rule 2 attributes a position to IARU which I can find no evidence it holds. The recently published IARU Region 1 band plan makes no mention of contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00329.html (14,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]