Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Consider\s+This\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Consider\s+This\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: w7zr@citlink.net (Richard Zalewski); Date: Mon Apr 22 11:37:47 2002; How about considering this regarding SO2R as a separate class. Most recent WPX SSB SO AB (A) HP NV4X 2880 Q 960 PFX 33 HRS 7.58M WZ7ZR 1836 Q 749 PFX 32 HRS 2.78M Not to take a thing away from K4MA a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00292.html (7,731 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Tue Apr 23 02:20:03 2002; I suspect if NV4X was SO1R he would have *only* had about 2800 x 950 for 7.0M... More variables here than you can see in the score listings. Randy, K5ZD; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00299.html (9,056 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n6ki@juno.com (Dennis Vernacchia); Date: Mon Apr 22 22:55:04 2002; Dick, I sent mail to this reflector over a yearago mirroring your suggestions that SO2R be a separate category but the guys that already run SO2R don't want to hear it now that they have the advantag; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00300.html (9,839 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: 9a3a@spidernet.com.cy (Ivo PEZER, 5B4ADA); Date: Tue Apr 23 15:01:21 2002; Unfortunatelly, our hoby of contesting is far from being equal to all participants. SO2R is just one of the latest developements that have caused many concerns. But, maybe one can look at SO2R from o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00304.html (10,300 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Tue Apr 23 11:14:48 2002; Dennis, I added a second radio a few years ago to improve my competiveness (and fun!) as a single-op, or SOA. Now that some single ops have found a way to improve their scores within the rules you wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00305.html (12,080 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com); Date: Tue Apr 23 14:27:10 2002; At the risk of beating a horse that has assumed room temperature a long time ago, Randy (K5ZD) is absolutely right. There are far more variables involved than just SO1R vs SO2R. Do we also start sepa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00311.html (11,563 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: w0uo@cs.com (w0uo@cs.com); Date: Tue Apr 23 14:46:09 2002; Contesters: Dennis' suggestion is right on. The quickest way to expose an advantage, or lack thereof, is to include it in contest reporting. It should be obvious whether such an advantage exists with; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00312.html (12,041 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Tue Apr 23 11:48:43 2002; In the world of computers the ubiquitous use of "TLA's" has been dominating the ideology of descriptive language for many years. Of course, "TLA's" stands for "three letter abbreviations". The theory; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00313.html (13,803 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue Apr 23 15:36:45 2002; SO2R is not a recent development. SO2R operating is decades old. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, SO2R isn't a matter of buying equipment. Having two radios doesn't suddenly given you an overwhel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00315.html (9,683 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Tue Apr 23 21:45:59 2002; No, it's not a fair test. There are too many variables, and the causal relationship of one variable vs. another is not adequately isolated. You would need ops of SO1R vs. SO2R selected randomly to do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00318.html (13,790 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4ga@hemc.net (aa4ga@hemc.net); Date: Tue Apr 23 18:05:12 2002; Uh, who says SO2R isn't an advantage? Of course it is to those doing it, or they wouldn't be doing it. Having computer logging is an advantage over paper logging and a memory keyer. A memory keyer is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00319.html (9,689 bytes)
12. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Tue Apr 23 19:33:02 2002; "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net> wrote, among other things: "Further, consider the efforts of Fred, K3ZO. He manages to hold his own quite nicely with just one radio." While I agree, I have yet to see; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00323.html (8,617 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Tue Apr 23 16:51:18 2002; Right idea, but the wrong definition. 8 radios and 8 towers wouldn't even be competitive as a multi-multi station. But SO8R, now you're talking!; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00326.html (8,806 bytes)
14. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Tue Apr 23 17:11:22 2002; Well, the problem with this line of thought is that if SO2R did not provide a significant advantage, the results would still probably look like it did. Only those who are already scoring near the top; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00327.html (14,036 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com); Date: Tue Apr 23 22:52:08 2002; KR6X, The quickest way to expose {an advantage, or lack thereof}, is to include it in contest reporting. It should be obvious whether such an advantage exists within just a few months. SO2R and score; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00328.html (9,867 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones); Date: Tue Apr 23 22:33:51 2002; Frankly, from your first sentence this last message from you shows a misunderstanding of my post. "cause and effect" One can show that there is a statistical relationship between higher scores and SO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00332.html (12,758 bytes)
17. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kl7ra@blizzard.gcgo.nasa.gov (KL7RA); Date: Wed Apr 24 09:36:01 2002; Bill replies: I had a complete two station setup in the 60's, so2r switching and all. Unfortunately it was used for instant band hopping as I never acquired the skill to tune a second radio for mults; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00333.html (9,790 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Wed Apr 24 08:42:14 2002; Didn't anyone really READ Dennis' post? WHERE did he say anything about a seperate category for SO2R? I just reread it, and still don't see it. "I also suggested that each contest summary that posted; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00334.html (8,761 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: ums@nconnect.net (Gary Sutcliffe); Date: Wed Apr 24 08:06:21 2002; Radio contesting is unfair. Someone with better antennas, radios, location, etc. will always have an advantage over an equivalent operator with a lesser station. That's life. Or, maybe it is just a n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00336.html (9,137 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Wed Apr 24 12:31:53 2002; This is the wrong question. No one said that SO2R was not an advantage. From what I've read, most agree that it is a significant advantage. Anything that provides a detectable improvement to one's sc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00345.html (9,878 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]