- 1. [CQ-Contest] Checking coax (score: 1)
- Author: k4ro@k4ro.net (K4RO Kirk Pickering)
- Date: Wed Jul 8 18:42:22 1998
- I just installed several new runs of coax and hardline, and would like to know what methods you use to check on your feedline's condition. W3LPL talked about this at Dayton a few years ago. 1) Find a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00079.html (7,316 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Checking coax (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy L. Olinger)
- Date: Thu Jul 9 00:37:43 1998
- Hi, Frank's method is fast, and fingers coax as long as the antenna & stuff at the other end does not change. Quickest way to determine that nothing has changed. (It is *possible* that the coax could
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00081.html (8,205 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Checking coax (score: 1)
- Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
- Date: Thu Jul 9 05:31:47 1998
- I was also in the audience when Frank made that recommendation at Dayton. You have his comments exactly correct. Just before the convention, I had made the recommendation, on one of the reflectors, t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00082.html (10,147 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Checking coax (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy L. Olinger)
- Date: Thu Jul 9 00:37:43 1998
- Hi, Frank's method is fast, and fingers coax as long as the antenna & stuff at the other end does not change. Quickest way to determine that nothing has changed. (It is *possible* that the coax could
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00330.html (8,225 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu