- 1. [CQ-Contest] Check # in SS (score: 1)
- Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:35:40 -0500
- Now this is interesting. I asked the below statement in another group. And did not get the answer I was expecting for sure. Lets see what I get here. Not to start up the controversy again of using a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00063.html (7,857 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Check # in SS (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 21:02:23 -0400
- What is the most efficient to use? If you would like an off hand, outside observer kind of response, 1 - I maintain that all CW Qs and exchange info be no faster than 25 WPM at all times. This would
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00067.html (7,990 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu