Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+by\s+M\/S\s+\-\s+3\s+QSO\s+\"penalty\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+by\s+M\/S\s+\-\s+3\s+QSO\s+\"penalty\"\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optonline.net; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:06:45 -0400; Another reason to eliminate the "teach me the proper logging" stoooopid 3 QSO penalty. I Operated QRP in CQ WW on 160. Typically I spent half an hour to make QSO, waiting for pileup to die. I make fe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00456.html (7,997 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" (score: 1): Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:52:30 -0700 (PDT); Then you didn't work them. They worked someone else while you thought they were working you. Better luck next time. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Ya; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00467.html (7,699 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:37:24 -0000; Yuri, we grow tired of your constant harping on this topic. 20+ years ago I recall you had a score reduction in an ARRL DX Contest due to mistakes in the log. You made the argument that missing just; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00481.html (10,093 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:12:19 -0500; Penalties for inaccuracy only punish the inaccurate, which is the way it should be. 73, kelly ve4xt -- Original Message -- From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com> Se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00490.html (11,425 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]