Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Callsigns\s+and\s+such\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Callsigns\s+and\s+such\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor); Date: Wed Mar 12 21:36:41 2003; Hi all, Which is more important, a short snappy call that CQs nicely or a longer, a la WD4AHZ, call that kind of hangs out of the tail end of a pileup? I'd say that unless you spend a lot of time QRP; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00154.html (7,987 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne); Date: Fri Mar 14 01:55:30 2003; has the edge. Hi Kelly, et al In my years of DX'ing, I've finally came to the conclusion that I will never be first one to call in a pileup. I've had much better luck by hanging back a second or so t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00174.html (7,865 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: k5iid@ntelos.net (Tom Horton); Date: Fri Mar 14 16:05:06 2003; Tom, Shame on you for telling everyone about this technique! You should have said that it is important that they call immediately. That way, those of us who do the "hang back" technique have an even; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00177.html (9,281 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Fri Mar 14 14:20:54 2003; A number of times during ARRL DX CW, I found myself in a pileup. Operating QRP, I try to think my way to the QSO. I'll move around a bit (moving about 0.1-0.2 kHz below him is often effective, as is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00180.html (7,538 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sat Mar 15 09:23:15 2003; And I guess it's hard to fault the QRP guys for doing this. But if you ever want to hear a pileup dissolve into chaos, listen to one where the operator "in charge" seems to make a practice of answeri; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00182.html (8,038 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne); Date: Sun Mar 16 02:13:20 2003; the DX emerge on Hi Pete. Usually I agree with you, but what happens in a pileup when the DX says K5? Utter chaos! 73 Tom W7WHY; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00189.html (7,339 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun Mar 16 15:05:43 2003; You're right -- probably I should have used "K5I" or even "ID?" as my example. Either way, what I meant to say was go ahead and answer, send the exchange and then get a callsign fill. "AGN" sent quic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00191.html (7,677 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and such (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Mon Mar 17 09:11:22 2003; Heck, Tom. It's worse than that When the DX says "W7WHY 599K", there are a dozen or more of stations (some with familiar callsigns) throwing out their callsign while you are trying to respond -- and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00195.html (7,788 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]