Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Calling\s+Out\s+Needed\s+Sections\s+\-\s+Soliciting\s+Contacts\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:27:42 -0800
"I did see several cries for NL on the cluster and was tempted to respond" Um, is it just me or does making a spot with "Please spot [pick what you need]" or "I need [xxx]" qualify as a solicitation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00232.html (7,974 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:48:42 -0500
Hi Ward: I am guilty of this 2-3 times last weekend in my ultimately unsuccessful search for Vermont for mult #80. My frustration about missing what is normally an easy mult from NH added to my lidd
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00239.html (9,278 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:11:22 -0800
== http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-all.html: 3.10.The use of non-Amateur Radio means of communication (for example, Internet or telephone) to solicit a contact (or contacts) during t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00242.html (9,469 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:23:30 -0600
I can't believe I'm saying this: Ward, I think you're splitting hairs. I think the telnet version of packet (or whatever you call that) has been so assimilated into what hams do that it would qualif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00251.html (8,770 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:51:28 -0800
U stands for Unlimited, but that does not mean we can do anything we want on the spotting networks. There are still fairly clear rules for the various categories about what constitutes acceptable us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00255.html (10,343 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 04:19:35 -0000
Ward during the contest I was forced, by my body, to give up early.I connected to my local cluster and could not believe my eyes. Here are direct. blatant, solicitations in the form of announcements.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00259.html (10,699 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 07:04:48 -0600
And this guy has rightfully earned his new "Single Operator Assisted Clean Sweep Dixie Cup" to put on his shelf next to all his other prestigious awards (Allow 4-6 weeks for delivery). It baffles me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00267.html (8,840 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Out Needed Sections - Soliciting Contacts? (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:13:09 -0800
Just so there is no confusion, I did not use packet. I did not make any posts nor did I look at any posts. Mal omitted all calls except mine. It evidently was a blind post TO me, certainly NOT BY ME.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00276.html (11,382 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu