Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Callers\s+on\s+EXACTLY\s+the\s+same\s+frequency\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:51:24 -0600
During some of my modest runs in the CW ARRL DX contest last weekend, it seemed many of the callers were on exactly the same frequency, making it really hard to pick out a call. This phenomenon seems
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00122.html (10,422 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: Larry <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:47:34 -0500
A vague recollection but at one time I thought the N1MMLogger had the random offset. Maybe it was an option. I didn't pursue it personally. 73, Larry W6NWS On 2/22/2016 7:51 PM, Scott Ellington wrote
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00145.html (11,027 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:56:31 +0000
N1MM already randomized incoming spots for that reason.. Sent from my Windows tablet During some of my modest runs in the CW ARRL DX contest last weekend, it seemed many of the callers were on exactl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00146.html (11,384 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:31:18 -0700
There's a setting in N1MM to create a random offset on spots. Barry W2UP On 2/22/2016 17:51, Scott Ellington wrote: During some of my modest runs in the CW ARRL DX contest last weekend, it seemed man
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00152.html (11,040 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: George K5KG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 08:57:10 -0500
There were many stations calling DX stations dead zero beat (or nearly so) on their frequency. This, of course, masked who the DX station was responding to, and was commonplace during the entire cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00161.html (12,484 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: Scott Ellington <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:11:17 -0600
I see. That's under Telnet: Filters. I only operate unassisted, but I hope others will use this feature. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott Ellington K9MA Madison, Wisconsin, USA k9ma@sdellington.us ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00213.html (10,632 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Callers on EXACTLY the same frequency (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:34 -0500
When I operated as a crystal-controlled Novice in 1961 *everybody* called off frequency except those Generals with their fancy variable frequency oscillators. If there had been a contest reflector ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00226.html (6,976 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu