Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+speed\s+\-\s+send\s+vs\.\s+copy\s+\-\s+and\s+QRP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+speed\s+\-\s+send\s+vs\.\s+copy\s+\-\s+and\s+QRP\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW speed - send vs. copy - and QRP (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue Nov 17 10:47:29 1998; I would go ahead and send your exchange at 15 -- otherwise you risk exactly the sort of confusion you describe. The time saved is minimal -- on the order of a second or two for the difference between; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00242.html (11,280 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CW speed - send vs. copy - and QRP (score: 1): Author: sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu (Scott Ellington); Date: Tue Nov 17 10:35:58 1998; I agree with Pete: Send at the speed you can copy, and the other station should match your speed. If s/he doesn't, send "AGN QRS". 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott Ellington sdelling@facstaff.wisc.edu Madison; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00246.html (8,734 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]