Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Sprint\/FOC\/RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Sprint\/FOC\/RTTY\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint/FOC/RTTY (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:57:24 -0700; To my great disappointment, the February CW Sprint has been scheduled for the same weekend as the FOC marathon and (yet another everyone-works-everyone) RTTY contest. For the past several years, this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00034.html (6,927 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint/FOC/RTTY (score: 1): Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:11:30 -0500; Though this is a little late (sorry about that...digest mode you know) I think the idea was to avoid the much more popular WPX RTTY Contest scheduled for next weekend. The conflict with the XE RTTY C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00039.html (8,847 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Sprint/FOC/RTTY (score: 1): Author: Rick Tavan N6XI <rtavan@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:36:24 -0800; Thanks for the Sprint Qs, Steve. Sorry I missed you in the Marathon. I think the intent was to avoid the bigger conflict with WPX RTTY. That contest has far more participants than the Marathon. Altho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00048.html (8,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]