Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CTU\s+Survey\s+Results\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: Andy Blank <n2nt@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 07:12:18 -0400
With thanks to those of you who took the time to fill out the survey results for contest software; Here is the link to the results of the survey: http://www.kkn.net/~n2nc/CTU_2007_Logging_Programs/ U
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00018.html (7,618 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 23:49:42 +0600
Hi Andy and all, May I disagree with some of your statements given in the PDF presentation regarding TRlog. In Advanced Features you did not mention one very important thing. The unique feature of TR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00023.html (9,453 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:36:18 -0500
I have used TR quite successfully in a DOS Window on my Win89 SE Machine. I keep the old Pentium 350 w/Windows 98 specifically because it sends CW without having to buy an expensive external keyer fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00025.html (10,878 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:11:08 -0000
I'm using a Compaq, with a +3400 AMD processor and windows XP Home and not using any interface for CW or Rig control with N1MM software. I did take and Old PCI card from my old box with 2 com 1 Lpt a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00026.html (12,980 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:13:40 -0500
Just a minor point, Win98 is not a Windows Operating system. It is a GUI application running on top of a DOS operating system. This is quite different from the real Windows operating systems such as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00027.html (10,672 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:42:02 +0600
application running on top of a DOS operating system. Win NT, 2000, XP and I hate to mention it: Vista. All of these systems do not allow direct access to ports as DOS does and this is the reason th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00030.html (8,502 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:53:19 -0500 (CDT)
I had my first experience with Windows Vista the other day and I am NOT happy. I have two small, portable scanners at work which have worked fine on every computer I've installed the software on with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00036.html (9,392 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "w4ZW" <w4zw@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:55:00 -0400
Same experience here. I've run a home network of more than 10 computers through iterations of Windows for workgroups through the years up thru XP Pro. I bought Windows Vista Ultimate and had sorry ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00037.html (10,655 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 10:20:51 -0500
I think these posts point out some of the problems that a lot of us face with computer logging, computer interfaces, etc. My son is the in the software business and, although this certainly doesn't m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00038.html (12,232 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:52:27 -0500
Bill, I presume that you are referring to my comments so I will respond. My response was to point out that Andy N2NT's summary was correct when he said TR would not work on a Windows machine. Anyone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00040.html (13,432 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CTU Survey Results (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@npgcable.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:45:37 -0700
I gently suggest that this blanket statements is not completely correct. It depends on how one defines success. TR can work on an XP machine, but it will not send CW on the parallel port. I have succ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00041.html (8,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu