Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+is\s+King\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CT\s+is\s+King\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: Peter Hutter <phutter@Princeton.EDU>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:10:45 -0400; Most serious contest operators and station owners still use CT. I think It's the most reliable software available and best used in a DOS environment. There's nothing worse than a network crash while; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00641.html (8,160 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:46:09 +0300; I have worked almost 12000 qsos in 96 hours with CTWin (Windows version - with XP) without a single problem (knock, knock). But " It's the most reliable software available "? No ... I would never eve; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00645.html (8,665 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Mirko Sibilja" <s57ad@amis.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 21:08:08 +0200; Hello Peter, I think you've never been tried TRLog and its network capabilities. Even while we had serious RFI issues which "blocked" CW keying and so on, TRLog network worked without a single failur; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00646.html (9,946 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 15:23:40 -0400; We could do a formal survey, but if we take the top 3 USA SOA in the last ARRL DX CW, W2UP uses WL, K3WW uses WL, and KI1G uses WL. My guess is more multis still use CT, primarily because of the cost; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00647.html (9,683 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:23:44 -0400; The Signal Point Station PJ2T (Top DX M/M in ARRL CW, Top (claimed) M/2 score in ARRL SSB (for a three-peat)) runs Writelog. The mentioned automatic merging of logs with any QSOs made during a possib; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00651.html (10,482 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:17:37 -0000; Here's a formal survey - 48 of the 52 teams in WRTC 2002 chose to use CT. I could be off by 1-2. Stu KC1F _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00655.html (8,499 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:31:10 -0000; Well, at some point the old 386's start to die... so last year I upgraded to all win xp machines with wireless networking, rigblasters, and n1mm logger for the m/m and so2r setups here. It does f-key; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00656.html (11,308 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: F6BEE@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:32:59 EDT; Have a look at _www.win-test.com_ (http://www.win-test.com) It looks like CT, it has been designed for windows, it does much more than CT and it even works. It will again be used next week end by TM0; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00657.html (8,006 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:59:51 -0600; For some real world insight into what logging software the general contesting community prefers to use see the result to 108th survey question at contesting.com http://www.contesting.com/survey/108; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00659.html (8,622 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 01:56:27 -0000; Syl, That's really not a fair survey. Don't forget that many CT users don't have computers powerful enough for Internet acess :.) 73, Barry W2UP-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com New; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00667.html (9,165 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 21:57:04 -0700; _________________________________________________ True, of course, but try Windows XP. I have about 30,000 RTTY QSOs in the log using both WriteLog and N1MM Logger. XP has never crashed. Win98, on th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00673.html (8,543 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: mwdink@eskimo.com; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 07:57:26 -0700 (PDT); I find this debate funny - like my daddy is bigger than your daddy. I've done 'em all! - I wrote my first logger for the Commodore 128 - then with my first PC, I found CT. grandaddy of them all and a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00684.html (9,959 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT is King (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 07:20:42 -0700; _________________________________________________ Spoken in jest, I know, but it brings back the days of the 8088, Unix and Pine. May they all rest in peace. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT ______________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00706.html (8,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]