Hi all: Not sure why there are so many posts about "assisted." It is in the rules. http://www.cqww.com/WW%20Rules%202006.pdf Look under the definition of SINGLE OP. It says, "Those stations at which
Not sure why there are so many posts about "assisted." It is in the rules. http://www.cqww.com/WW%20Rules%202006.pdf -- Bravo CQ (and Doug for pointing this out)! In fact, CQ's rules go on to say, "T
. . . Here's some hard stuff not covered by the rules. 1. My buddy calls on 10m to tell me the band is open to the Pacific - no spots, just general advice. I turn the beam and, sure enough, pick up a
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Everyone with any common sense knows what "single op" and "unasissted" mean. There are only a very few ops who want to receive assistance and still claim to be s
We need that whole rule, Doug 1. Single Operator High: Those stations at which one person performs all of the operating, logging, and spotting functions. The use of DX alerting assistance of any kind
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:45:57 -0000
OK, so here's my beef. If that's so cut and dried, why does one contest sponsor declare that a single op using spotting networks is assisted in one contest while, in another, calls the same thing a "
OK, so here's my beef. If that's so cut and dried, why does one contest sponsor declare that a single op using spotting networks is assisted in one contest while, in another, calls the same thing a "
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- In a sense, both are the same thing with different names. One has the other ops in your shack, the other has them in other shacks, but the point is you are being
Bartender, I'd like a double of whatever Coslo is drinking. Mmmmmmm yummmmmmmmm! That stuff is excellent. Now let me see if I can talk like him. "Anyone who answers your CQ is assisting you, therefo
Hi Paul I think you answered your own question with the first line. Any sponser can make any rule they want. Some even have contest's where use of telnet doesn't make one 'assisted'. 73 Tom W7WHY ___
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:18:30 -0000
Yep, so they should just call it one or the other consistently and be done with it. 73 -- Paul VO1HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
A Heaven Hill bourbon and cola, IIRC. Now yer gettin' it! Actually Hans, my definition of assisted and yours are the same. Organized systems to tell people where other people are. Maybe a little like