Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+NIL\s+penalty\s+for\s+zero\s+pointer\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+NIL\s+penalty\s+for\s+zero\s+pointer\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW NIL penalty for zero pointer? (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 11:41:46 -0500; In CQ WW SSB I was fooling around ("but I repeat myself") on 15M. I figured to work a few loud guys, just to make sure the radio still played on SSB so I would be ready to work SS fone. I was logging; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00273.html (7,473 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW NIL penalty for zero pointer? (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 12:27:56 -0500 (EST); well, if you were a multiplier he would lose that. he would also lose 3 times the qso points, or 3*0=0. do you not remember this friend's callsign to put him in the log properly?? ___________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00281.html (8,269 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW NIL penalty for zero pointer? (score: 1): Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 20:54:28 -0500; Somebody replied privately: "0X3 is a 0 penalty plus 0 points for the lost QSO.. However, if you were the only US or zone 5 or whatever your friend logged he will lose the multiplier/multipliers. "CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00313.html (7,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]