- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
- Author: Gerry Treas K8GT <k8gt@mi.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:46:05 -0500
- Yes, he was amazing in the contest, but has been said before that Dan is a mutant with the following video that others have posted of him doing SO2R and reading his email on his smartphone as well: h
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00035.html (11,101 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
- Author: RA3AUU <ra3auu@srr.ru>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 22:52:27 +0300
- Octupus CQ is Octupus CQ no matter one band used or two. It is always interlocked CQ on two frequences with the difference that M/S has to do it on the same band with TX/RX antenna separations and fe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00036.html (14,674 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:07:55 -0500
- Guys, the bar was set in the last few years. There have been a number of stations running dual pileups already. There were videos last year of TO7A, but he had other issues that led to disqualificati
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00037.html (15,840 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
- Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:45:45 -0500
- Not sure why this is seen as being so unique. There is a group of hams that regularly works two radios on transmit. I would often do this during events like WAE where one band was very runnable and a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00041.html (16,740 bytes)
- 25. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
- Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:57:26 -0500
- What makes Dan's accomplishment so special is he ran rate when dealing with packet pileups on two different run bands at the same time. If you have ever had a big packet pileup, the stations calling
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00043.html (6,991 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu