Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+High\s+Rates\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:32:28 -0500
A new feature has been added to the CQ WW web site. It shows the high 60-minute QSO rates found in the submitted logs over the past 10 years. View the high rate records page at http://cqww.com/blog/c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00361.html (7,239 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 20:13:54 -0800 (PST)
Humbling.  That's all.  Humbling! __73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a Boy and His Radio" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00366.html (8,246 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:47:42 +0700
In my part of the world where English is definitely a second language and where some hams here think of every contact as a ragchew, I really doubt those rates ... if done in this region. One ham who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00368.html (9,318 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:08:58 -0800
WRONG. Those high rates simply show well equipped stations with good operators who, by virtue of their LOCATIONS and the SCORING RULES, are really IN the contest. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00373.html (7,909 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
So if you were to have operated from a good station in an advantageous location you would have won this last weekend? RIGHT. Silly me for having one second imagined otherwise... 73 Roger VE3ZI _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00002.html (7,802 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:50:36 -0500
N6MJ/ZF2MJ blew away the top rate and had an incredible score in last weekend's CQWW CW contest. He described how he did this in his 3830 post and you can watch him on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00006.html (8,014 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 20:04:15 -0800 (PST)
OK, Jim, you're simply in the wrong location and the scoring rules simply suck, or you'd have simply won. Me, I'm still humbled by that performance. Dit dit __73, de Hans, K0HB "Just a Boy and His Ra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00011.html (7,648 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:32:16 -0500
Do we need new categories - human and non-human? John KK9A Sent from my Smartphone. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00013.html (8,625 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:09:39 -0300
The audio of that operation is a legacy to mankind. Hope Dan makes it available for the rest of us to enjoy/learn. He shouldn't be worried about others learning from it. Humans cannot beat him! 73, M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00014.html (9,494 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:28:31 -0600
That video is just incredible! I just wish it had what he was hearing in his headset on the audio. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00017.html (8,904 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:59:53 -0600
We get it. We totally get it and we think this is ultracool to watch. At least I did. Fascinating. To us. I just hope nobody shares this video with non-cons as a way to highlight how much fun contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00019.html (10,903 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Igor Booklan <ra3auu@srr.ru>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:45:50 +0300
My sincere congratulations to Dan for such a great way of handling his runs! BUT ... Some few years ago when several M/S stations did so (octopus CQs) on the same band most of the people complained t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00021.html (11,320 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:12:31 -0500
What amazed me was that he was doing it, apparently, with two computers, two keyboards and two instances of his logging program. I'd love the hear the rationale for that approach 73, Pete N4ZR Downlo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00023.html (10,991 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:09:02 -0800
It isn't about ME, Hans, it's about the thousands of contesters outside the favored geography, many of them my neighbors. It isn't even about winning, but rather simply about being in the contest or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00025.html (8,923 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:55:22 -0500
I thought the objection to the octopi was that the M/S stations in question were CQing twice on the same band, once at the bottom and once at the top. Dan was rapidly switching between two pileups on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00026.html (13,485 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:42:42 -0300
It depends on personal taste and the logging software and SO2R controller you use. WT is not prepared to do that with a single PC and keboard out of the box (at least that's my own experience). With
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00027.html (13,492 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:28:32 +0000
Folks who think running through actuarial tables isn't exciting truly are among the uninitiated. :) -- Michael Adams, ACAS, MAAA | N1EN | mda@n1en.org --Original Message-- Fascinating. To us. I just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00029.html (9,340 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:34:59 +0100
What do you mean with "in the contest"? 73 Peter It isn't about ME, Hans, it's about the thousands of contesters outside the favored geography, many of them my neighbors. It isn't even about winning,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00031.html (9,779 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:28:17 -0500
It saves switching between radio A and B in the logging software. It is very common to use two computers on RTTY. John KK9A What amazed me was that he was doing it, apparently, with two computers, tw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00033.html (8,703 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 18:50:50 +0000
When it comes to such an awesome display of skill, given the nature of demographics, geography, and propagation, I don't see how you can get to a level playing field when it comes to a rate-fest cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00034.html (10,469 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu