Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+DX\s+SSB\s+Midwest\s+vs\s+East\s+Coast\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Ray Mikula <rmikula@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 12:57:33 -0600
I have an informal Competition with a ham who lives on the East Coast (Richmond, VA). I live in the Midwest (Chicago Northern Suburbs). In last weeks CQ WW DX SSB contest, he outdid me with many more
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00085.html (7,921 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: "Pete Chamalian" <w1rm@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 15:35:15 -0500
Ray, some thoughts... Are you both using the same spot source? By that I mean are you both connected to the same telnet station? Not all telnet stations are interconnected so it is possible that you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00087.html (10,088 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Ray, I'm by no means a propagation expert, as has been frequently pointed out by others when I post, but: Location makes a big difference.     Libertyville, IL   42N   88W        Richmond, VA   38
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00092.html (11,505 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:13:21 +0000
When you say he had 94 mor multipliers than you on 10M.....since I only had a total of 95 multipliers on 10M and I did pretty well in the contest, how many multipliers total did you and your friend g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00095.html (7,890 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 13:03:51 -0800
And 10M propagation is extremely dependent on location of both stations, much more so than on lower HF bands. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00097.html (8,223 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: SRB Domeneshop <srb@lb3re.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 23:33:46 +0100
Hello I was happy with short opening from LN8W to US & Canada on 31th oct - had nice rate for 3-4 hour We used 3 stack of OB21-6 Best Regards, Stein-Roar Brobakken srb@lb3re.com LB3RE LC0X K3RAG Skyp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00099.html (8,563 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: dimitri cosson <dimitri.cosson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 21:54:04 +0100
Hi Lacy, You're right, it's often better to be in Western EU to work US but it's better for central EU to work Asia/JA so... You should read the 9A1UN's comment operating 9A1P on 15m during the last
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00119.html (16,487 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: "OM3RM" <om3rm@om-power.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 23:18:33 +0100
Dimitry, 9A is for us not central Europe. Easy to compare: OM2VL 4x 6 ele. Vertical stack ( highest antenna on 33 m ) and second direction 6 el. Yagi 2734 QSO's 9A1P 1 Yagi antenna on small 12 m towe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00120.html (17,342 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:59:29 -0500
The distance from OM2VL to 9A1P is about 215 miles. If your contention is that those two locations are not comparable, then -no- QTHs are comparable - ever. OM2VLs QTH is also 265 miles from DL2ARD w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00121.html (19,647 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Weisz László via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:03:14 +0100
"the problem is often between the chair and the transceiver" Yes of course this top contester told the true, I agree, but there is the word: often... With respect of top contester, I admire lot's of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00123.html (12,034 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 01:46:02 -0700
Depending upon the band and the quirks of propagation, 200 miles can indeed be significant.   I live about 200 miles south-southeast of Phoenix, Arizona where the bulk of the membership of the contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00124.html (10,536 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 19:25:28 +0000
To have a look at some hypotheticals - Have a look at the Reverse Beacon Network on http://www.reversebeacon.net/analysis/ I did a comparison between the top three Zone 5 Stations in the CQWW 2020 an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00133.html (12,661 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu