- 1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
- system allows one to win world high from his home station, no need to go to D4 or HC8 or PJ because of discriminatory point system. Are you telling me that it is fair to get 3 points for Eu QSO from
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00408.html (8,793 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:31:00 EDT
- There's a reason this contest has become so popular - it's REALLY HARD TO WIN. And because it's hard, it requires people who want to really compete to take it very seriously, and that seriousness fil
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00409.html (8,704 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
- Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:39:05 -0700
- interesting points..............and to me the most interesting being the "list of important contests" as stated. finding a chap's "important contests" would be an avenue into his (or his wife's) psyc
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00410.html (7,465 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
- Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:53:14 +0100
- I've been enjoying following this thread. I think I get it now. If you don't like a particular contest because the scoring system or the method of adjudication (or the time taken with certificates, o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00411.html (9,025 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
- Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
- And that psyche description for me and my XYL would be: Anything worth doing is worth doing to a total extreme! Mary would chuckle at that description of my lifelong involvement in ham radio. When we
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00413.html (9,216 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu