Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+160m\s+SSB\s+contest\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 15:08:02 -0800 (PST)
I am sure this sentiment will be unpopular on this reflector - sorry. As I'm sure everybody knows, this was the weekend of the CQ 160m SSB contest. This has meant that the band has been full of loud
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00530.html (8,629 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:21:25 -0500
Roger, The real problem is that there is still no worldwide allocation on 160. Many in Europe only have 1810 to 1850 and some who do have more of the band can only run low power (10 watts) above say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00555.html (11,309 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Sorry Dave, I don't believe that is the real problem at all. Of course the different allocations make things difficult. Of course it will be virtually impossible to secure the whole 200kHz worldwide.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00558.html (12,121 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:07:11 +0000
-http://www.arrl.org/band-plan The ARRL band plane indicates SSB OPERATION starting on 1843 MHz. This is not new. There are two major phone 160 contests a year, ARRL and CQ, 3.8 % of all weekends. Yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00569.html (13,488 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:38:16 -0600
Why Not? It's not like they did not impose operating restrictions in the past. "A large part of the U.S. 160 meter band was allocated on a primary basis to the LORAN <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00573.html (8,324 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:10:57 -0500
Please keep in mind that bandplans are designed for NORMAL loading/day to day activities on a band. A contest introduces considerably more activity, so bandplans kinda go out the window for major con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00575.html (8,323 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB Contest (score: 1)
Author: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 04:03:28 -0800 (PST)
"The ARRL band plane indicates SSB OPERATION starting on 1843 MHz. This is not new. There are two  major phone 160 contests a year, ARRL and CQ,  3.8 % of all weekends. You are proposing all SSB oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00634.html (8,416 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160m SSB contest (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindquist, WW1ME" <ww1me@roadrunner.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:50:26 -0500
Belated comment, I know. Just reviewing the unopened backlog on this reflector. Petitions to create mode-specific subbands for 160 (one would have restricted SSB operation to above 1843) have been FC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-03/msg00078.html (8,188 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu