Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+160\s+Multipliers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+160\s+Multipliers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 Multipliers (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:03:44 -0500; OK, Iam NOT massaging any data in any log, I don't even have the log. Sooooo, IF you're one of the "sticklers" for such things, send me a "warning missile back, or hit the delete key. But, Iwas opera; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00284.html (8,496 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 Multipliers (score: 1): Author: Andy Blank <andyn2nt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:35:41 -0500; The language is a remnant from the old rules. It was pointed out numerous times and will be changed for next year's rules to be less confusing. There is no problem, the log checking software calculat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-01/msg00285.html (9,736 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]