Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+254\,\s+Issue\s+6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+254\,\s+Issue\s+6\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 254, Issue 6 (score: 1): Author: NM5M <nm5meric@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:22:08 -0600; A solution to the ack issue is to make a QSO count (via log checking) only if the info is correct on both sides. Those super competitive would be incentivized to be sure their info was received corre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00076.html (84,128 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]