- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 216, Issue 3 (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Koenig <k4akkron@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:05:41 -0600
- Does anyone on this list have anything Positive to say ? So far this week we have ... Contests Suck Contesting from W6 Sucks Please Copy Sucks (And I'll delete the valid Q) Operators Suck Rules Suck
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00021.html (17,880 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 216, Issue 3 (score: 1)
- Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:47:29 +0200
- Ron and all, This is Ultra Positive to the superlative and beyond! There is seldom an opportunity to collectively identify so many well defined topics for improvement. Keep on Contesting. With this a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00022.html (20,421 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 216, Issue 3 (score: 1)
- Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 22:38:47 +0000
- You forgot people who like CQWW are disgusting. 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com@contesting.com> on b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00023.html (19,633 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu