Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+199\,\s+Issue\s+20\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+199\,\s+Issue\s+20\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 199, Issue 20 (score: 1): Author: Ars W6ABM <arsw6abm@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 17:10:18 -0700; I worked from the Cloud Cap Lookout at Crater Lake National Park in Oregon, CN82xv. We do a special event for the Park's anniversary each year. I started doing 6 meters there several years ago for th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00073.html (46,987 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 199, Issue 20 (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:45:12 -0400; I concur with Jims suggestion about analog and digital categories. It does two things - it puts each in their own category so that they arent competing against each other and it shuts up the grumblin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00091.html (8,511 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 199, Issue 20 (score: 1): Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:01:50 +0000 (UTC); A lot of the commenters have only been thinking about 6m in VHF contests. Giving points for different modes doesn't make sense on the higher bands. There most contacts are not random but are arranged; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00098.html (11,302 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]