Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+150\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\-Contest\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+150\,\s+Issue\s+1\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 150, Issue 1 (score: 1): Author: Marvin Bloomquist <n5aw@281.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:51:03 -0500; Unfortunately the current low band bonus point system actually discourages operation on 80 and 160. Why fight the QRN and tougher propagation when you can get the same points on 40 meters. Actually i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00013.html (9,580 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 150, Issue 1 (score: 1): Author: George Vlachopoulos via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC); Thats a good propose""A suggestion - change the points for QSO's with another continent to 4 points on 40, 5 on 80 and 6 on 160"". At my my opinion, there is a better propose, All multipliers to coun; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-06/msg00021.html (11,238 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]