- 1. [CQ-Contest] CHEATERS - ala N6TJ (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optimum.net
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:18:01 +0000 (GMT)
- Well, it sure is refreshing to see someone "name the names" (or calls). Kudos to Jim. It would be a wonderful thing if "the cheaters" would be rewarded with an on-the-air, during the contest, boycott
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00238.html (7,110 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHEATERS - ala N6TJ (score: 1)
- Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:40:13 -0600
- a published list of cheaters... prior to closing the acceptance of logs... would allow the removal of their qsos...and THAT would work!!!That would get me a WHOLE lot more interested in working the b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00239.html (8,272 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHEATERS - ala N6TJ (score: 1)
- Author: Luc Moreira <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 20:07:58 -0300
- Dale, What about grey zone, where we could make bad judgment. I can living with false negatives (no catching cheaters) - I would hate be the second one, but I can not live with false positives (DQing
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00242.html (7,792 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CHEATERS - ala N6TJ (score: 1)
- Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:17:06 +0200
- Luc, PW7T wrote: I would hate even more be the first one by an injustice. Jim, N6TJ wrote: Last week, I was fortunate to have dinner in Washington, D.C. with my friend of many years, and contests, Sc
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00244.html (9,043 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu