Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CAC\s+\.\.\.\.\.\s+was\s+\"radio\-sport\.net\s+web\s+site\s+or\s+copy\s+and\s+paste\s+journalism\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CAC\s+\.\.\.\.\.\s+was\s+\"radio\-sport\.net\s+web\s+site\s+or\s+copy\s+and\s+paste\s+journalism\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or copy and paste journalism (score: 1): Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:05:42 -0400; I agree with part of W5OV's statement. If they agreed to secrecy, they should be tied to it. However, if the group does disband and get re-built, it's the perfect time to change it to transparent. Pe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00226.html (8,228 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or copy and paste journalism (score: 1): Author: e73m@e73m.com; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 01:24:57 -0500; I agree with Ed, RDXC is good example for new contest. BTW my posts are being rejected by list and I can not see why, if this one goes to trash by moderators then I get the message. 73 Danny ________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00230.html (9,015 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site or copy and paste journalism (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 05:30:56 -0500; Ed, While I understand the desire here, but the point is that this is a committee. The committee has to do its job and having the public involved in debating every idea or opinion expressed in their; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00231.html (10,571 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]