Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Boys\'\s+Life\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Boys\'\s+Life\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Boys' Life (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Mon Jan 21 11:30:51 2002; Response to K4VUD's post: Charly, thanks for your take on the editorial situation at QST. Certainly your credentials add some amount of credibility to your critique. The ARRL appears to "promote from; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00415.html (8,386 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Boys' Life (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Mon Jan 21 12:25:20 2002; Yes, to emails sent directly to him. I was referring to the fact that those guys don't subscribe to and read the cq-contest reflector like you and I do. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00418.html (6,888 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Boys' Life (score: 1): Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed Jan 23 10:07:29 2002; Well I for one was fooled! His replies read like he lurked in the woodwork and felt it was time to say someting. I found Mark Wilson's replies thoughtful, wise, and addressed the concerns expressed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00482.html (7,073 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]