I hope I understand correctly draft WRTC 2014 rules http://www.wrtc2014.org/contest/wrtc-rules/ point 16.2.4: *Both Radio A and Radio B are allowed to transmit. The contest is a full Multi-Operator T
I like the change. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com Http://www.w0mu.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
Always amazes me, the whole WRTC process. 50% of the participants have not qualified to go, yet go every event. Now these, non-qualifiers can operate the entire contest just by virtue of being long t
It is not so crazy. It is, after all, the World Radiosport TEAM Competition. Lots of Olympic teams are picked on non-statistical bases - think basketball. The question of how low power qualifications
I wonder how many team captains would intentionally choose an inferior team mate. I bet not many. I suspect more are chosen that are highly competent but for whatever reason may not have been able to
M/M operation. And a M/2 with two operators is a lot more like a single op effort than a M/2 with six operators. If you brew coffee for team, you get same points (in all multi classes) ... 73 Timo O
Therefore, WRTC should be Single Op. event (WRSOC). Put your SO1,2,3 or 4R setup and show your skills! Simple as that.... So one must brew coffee for himself :) 73, Mladen YT6W M/M operation. And
Making WRTC single op would make more sense but it would limit fun from 100 to 50 competitors. I dont see future of WRTC with single players - specially that we know what effort is needed to organize
Mladen, good point, that would be a very interesting competition :))) Filipe CT1ILT - CR6K -- Regards/Cumprimentos, Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt _____________________________
Filipe, i can bet it would,my friend! But i assume,if so,some of the people wouldn't be so persistent qualifying for the event! Plus...it leaves no room for further speculation ....who are using se