Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Big\s+change\s+in\s+WRTC\s+rules\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: José Nunes CT1BOH <ct1boh@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 16:05:44 +0100
I hope I understand correctly draft WRTC 2014 rules http://www.wrtc2014.org/contest/wrtc-rules/ point 16.2.4: *Both Radio A and Radio B are allowed to transmit. The contest is a full Multi-Operator T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00110.html (8,416 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:11:17 -0600
I like the change. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net:23 or w0mu-1.dnsdynamic.com Http://www.w0mu.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00112.html (8,974 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 05:56:10 -0400
Always amazes me, the whole WRTC process. 50% of the participants have not qualified to go, yet go every event. Now these, non-qualifiers can operate the entire contest just by virtue of being long t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00119.html (8,400 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:49:00 -0400 (EDT)
It is not so crazy. It is, after all, the World Radiosport TEAM Competition. Lots of Olympic teams are picked on non-statistical bases - think basketball. The question of how low power qualifications
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00122.html (9,756 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 11:11:03 -0700
I wonder how many team captains would intentionally choose an inferior team mate. I bet not many. I suspect more are chosen that are highly competent but for whatever reason may not have been able to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00123.html (9,539 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 22:59:33 +0300
M/M operation. And a M/2 with two operators is a lot more like a single op effort than a M/2 with six operators. If you brew coffee for team, you get same points (in all multi classes) ... 73 Timo O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00124.html (7,709 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 05:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Therefore, WRTC should be Single Op. event (WRSOC). Put your SO1,2,3 or 4R setup and show your skills! Simple as that....   So one must brew coffee for himself :)   73, Mladen YT6W M/M operation. And
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00127.html (9,212 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: 'Hrvoje Horvat' <hrle@ipazin.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:09:38 +0200
Making WRTC single op would make more sense but it would limit fun from 100 to 50 competitors. I dont see future of WRTC with single players - specially that we know what effort is needed to organize
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00132.html (8,670 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:39:11 +0100
Mladen, good point, that would be a very interesting competition :))) Filipe CT1ILT - CR6K -- Regards/Cumprimentos, Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00133.html (9,689 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules (score: 1)
Author: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Filipe, i can bet it would,my friend! But i assume,if so,some of the people wouldn't be so persistent qualifying for the event!   Plus...it leaves no room for further speculation ....who are using se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-05/msg00135.html (10,821 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu