Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Best\s+rigs\s+on\s+low\s+band\s+noise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Best\s+rigs\s+on\s+low\s+band\s+noise\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Best rigs on low band noise (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:46:44 -0000; Which radios are the best at handling and eliminating low band (80-40m) noise-both man made and natural? Interested in ones in the $1300 and less range. I am sure that the Icom 7800 or Yaesu FTDX9000; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00228.html (7,092 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best rigs on low band noise (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:51:18 -0400; I think the only thing IN your price range is the K2 or K2/100. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 ______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00232.html (8,296 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best rigs on low band noise (score: 1): Author: "Steve Lufcy" <k0ou@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:54:22 -0500; JohnAltho I am happy with my IC-775, I don't think you can get one for $1300. And, anyway, the best signal to noise I ever heard came out of an OmniVI - and you may be able to come up with one of tho; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00233.html (9,472 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best rigs on low band noise (score: 1): Author: "Mario" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:38:19 +0200; (80-40m) noise-both man made and natural? Any radio can do that with present day semiconductors, filters and DSP noise reduction. The main problem is receiving weak signals in the presence of strong; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00237.html (8,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]