Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Aurora\s+and\s+ARRLCW\s+conditions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Aurora\s+and\s+ARRLCW\s+conditions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Aurora and ARRLCW conditions (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Sun Feb 25 17:04:32 2001; Bruce, ZF2NT, asked about whether or not there was auroral activity possibly depressing US & VE signal strengths and lowering his score. The answer is YES! there was. There is a very useful NOAA webs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00189.html (7,653 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Aurora and ARRLCW conditions (score: 1): Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD); Date: Mon Feb 26 01:12:00 2001; Hi Bob, Is it allowed to use Internet resources to improve your score or knowledge of propagation while still being single op? I guess knowing what the Au looks like doesn't count as spotting, but it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00202.html (7,887 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Aurora and ARRLCW conditions (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Sun Feb 25 21:24:43 2001; Hi Randy, Really? Aren't you the same guy that basically said (I am paraphrasing) "If it isn't prohibited by the rules, then it is allowed?". Hmmm. Now of course we were referring to REAL abuses and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00207.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]