Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Attention\s+CQWW\s+SO2R\s+Competitors\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:17:04 +0000
"For example, a station tuning through the band and working spotted multipliers will sound the same on the SDR recordings, but is very obvious listening to the operator's headphone recordings." Bette
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00364.html (12,781 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:34:02 -0700
My question is relatively fundamental: Who elected this so-called "CQWW triumvirate" to tell us what we are supposed to do?? Some may think that they own this contest. Nope. Competitions are interest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00368.html (11,798 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:55:57 +0000
Truth be told though, I am happy that the massive cheating uncovered a few years ago was dealt with. However I get the idea that the contest committee isn't really sure about how to deal with it, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00371.html (13,166 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:56:06 -0400
...and plenty of collateral damage in their overzealous methods. Truth be told though, I am happy that the massive cheating uncovered a few years ago was dealt with. However I get the idea that the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00373.html (13,585 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Stockton <aluminumtubing@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 20:58:20 -0500
Lots of posts flying around about this subject. Will someone from the rules committee confirm that this is being considered? Just in case the CQ directors are keeping track of votes, I vote "no" on c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-06/msg00382.html (8,363 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 08:42:11 +0200
This is a pretty funny one too!! haha *"Q: As a Single Operator, can I post my scores to a live scoreboard? Can I view the scores of others?* Any entry class may post their scores to a live scoreboar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00002.html (7,836 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Attention CQWW SO2R Competitors (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@bowyer.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:24:36 +0100
That is a piece of astonishingly incompetent rule-setting. Peter G4MJS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00005.html (7,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu