Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Assisted\s+or\s+not\s+assisted\s+question\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 12:15:37 -0300
What about if you use a CW decoder to copy CW during the contest? Is this unassisted? 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00050.html (7,847 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 14:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
In my opinion, it does not. League general rules for Skimmer like technology refer to MULTI-CHANNEL decoders. If someone is using a CW Reader to help copy CW, we should encourage that. I know a numbe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00052.html (7,018 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 17:50:28 -0400
If the CW decoder is used only on the frequency to which your radio is tuned, it's legal for the Single Op (unassisted) category in ARRL contests. If it's part of a multi-channel decoder that provide
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00056.html (9,156 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Collins, Graham" <CollinG@navcanada.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:44:28 -0400
Hmmmm, interesting comments. My brain is a CW decoder. I guess I will have to start using a narrower CW filter and stop listening to signals that fall in or near my receivers passband band other than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00061.html (9,850 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:49:11 +0100
<snip> It seems to me this is a long way of describing the "do nothing" option. Please consider this - it's simple and unambiguous. CW decoders, whether single or multi-channel, are not permitted for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00077.html (9,006 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:00:20 -0400
I'd suggest a slightly different phrasing: "For phone and CW, devices, utilities, or receiver features which process received signals to provide automated audio or text suggestions as to the callsign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00079.html (11,065 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:11:39 -0500
Thing is, the means by which a given end result may be accomplished are many. Radio amateurs are an inventive bunch. If one means is (are?) outlawed, we will find another means. You'll end up playing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00080.html (9,170 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:04:24 -0500
It may sound heretical coming from an avid CW operator but I categorically reject the notion that the term "assistance" applies to any single-channel signal decoded off the air at a single-operator s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00082.html (12,504 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: KU7Y <ku7y.cw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:40:13 -0600
Something else to think about is how important all the "casual" operators are to the big scores the "contest" stations make. One of the things that many less skilled CW operators do is use a CW decod
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00085.html (10,213 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:19:24 -0400
The problem is that we don't have complete agreement on what means are "inappropriate". During the CW Skimmer debates on the reflector, many held the position that its use should be allowed in the S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00089.html (15,669 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:49:59 -0600
OK... so we all agree to disagree... fine. And we all agree that there needs to be discussion... fine.And we all agree that there is no hard fast answer. OR Hard slow answer either.So... let the rule
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00093.html (9,185 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:41:17 -0400
I'd like to think I resemble that remark. :) Last year's WPX was the first CW test I ever attempted...9 days after my first CW QSO. I did use a CW decoder...and I submitted my log as an assisted entr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00095.html (10,585 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: "Yannick DEVOS (XV4Y)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:23:30 +0700
Michael, Vladimir, Vladimir, I agree with the 3 points you gave in your e-mail. Michael, I am in the same situation than you. I started CW in march last month and tried a few contests in august. I fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00110.html (8,577 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Andy Smith <andy@m0vkg.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:44:23 +0100
Where in the rules does it state this? Or is this your opinion, as opposed to the actual rules? Not so simple and unambiguous, really. Should we be decoding RTTY and PSK in our heads too? Andy M0VKG
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00111.html (9,544 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:51:39 +0100
<Snip> OK, I see what Bob is getting at - we're all trying to do something similar. The definitions need to be comprehensive, unambiguous and agreed. The word "agreed" is the difficult bit. Without a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00114.html (9,823 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:08:26 -0700
Geez, we gonna need a lawyer to get on the air? How about this - eliminate everything between the mic (key, keyboard, keyer), the op, and the antenna. Hook the mic (key) directly to the transmit ante
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00118.html (8,966 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu