Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Assisted\s+or\s+multi\s+op\.\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:40:11 +0300
Hi, I was using telnet and spotted almost every station in contest. After contest I found what using cluster must be multi-op.? It is very important to me because my raw score as S.Op.LP Mixed is hig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00176.html (6,906 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:38:40 -0700
I don't think you were assisted based on what you wrote. Packet/telnet put me in the Multi-Op category because I used spots on the network to find stations. I can't see how you were assisted if you o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00178.html (8,284 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:52:14 -0400
Hi Sam, I too often wonder what category one would be in if they used the cluster only to send spots, not receive. But to contest organizers it is probably difficult to know who is a reader and who i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00179.html (8,416 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:39:22 +0000
The IARU rule is: "4.1.3. Use of spotting nets, packet, or multi-channel decoders (such as CW Skimmer) is not permitted. Single-operator stations that use spotting nets, packet or multi-channel decod
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00181.html (9,830 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:15:05 +0300
TNX for all! I sending my LOG today LY5W M/S Low power :) K1TTT report is an answer: http://www.k1ttt.net/logs/2010iaru_spots.zip Busiest spotters: Spotter count LY5W 705 DL6KVA 432 K6III 349 _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00187.html (8,135 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:51:41 -0400
It's sort of funny the way the rule is worded - as if using spotting assistance is shameful. Several ARRL contests don't have a single-op assisted category, but they classify single op + packet as mu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00188.html (11,766 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:37:55 EDT
If you enter as Multi-Single, I hope you followed the ten minute on a band rule. And that's ten minutes on the same mode as well as same band. Off hand, I believe the ARRL contests where packet gets
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00190.html (8,512 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:12:41 -0400
I think I probably did - I wasn't serious in any case. Maybe I'll submit as a check log to make the point that they need an Assisted category. 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, update
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00191.html (9,239 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:08:36 -0400
I recall this same issue from the RTTY Roundup. If I understand the rules correctly for these ARRL contests, this effectively rules out operating SO2R while using packet. I am hoping that this will b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00192.html (10,376 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:32:59 -0700
I'll be getting kicked to a checklog due to the 10 minute rule. I don't really care as I wasn't competing. I was more interested in having fun improving my cw skills and handing out points. I also th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00194.html (10,733 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:25:03 -0400
Well the IARU test has some unique rules. station to chase mults. Its still a fun contest. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00196.html (11,875 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:27:47 -0400
It probably also means no dual band SO2R due to the band change rule. Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00197.html (11,801 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:47:20 -0500
I'd like to see a like Field Day B class two person. for us old timers that are getting too old to stay up and run a full contest anymore. Yet don't have enough local interest to be a true multi op s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00199.html (11,760 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:27:29 -0400
aldewey@aol.com wrote: "I recall this same issue from the RTTY Roundup" Since the participation continues to grow, each year, I don't see it as an "issue"? "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" C'Ya, She
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00205.html (8,886 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu