- 1. [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: José Nunes CT1BOH <ct1boh@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:22:41 +0100
- I think this is really great in theory. An haedphones that adapts to each one audible frequency sprectrum *http://www.gizmag.com/nura-headphones-review-interview/43792/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00107.html (7,755 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:20:03 +0200
- Very interesting indeed! It will surely change matters in Hi-Fi music listening. For optimizing you S/N listening experience in Ham-Radio DX'ng/Contesting there are also other very relevant parameter
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00109.html (8,338 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: VE1DT <emailve1dt@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:39:57 -0300
- This seems to be a solution to a problem that has already been solved, at least for Ham-Radio DX'ng/Contesting. Of course, I have gone through several sets of headphones though the years, but by far
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00110.html (8,864 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:21:11 -0700
- This MAY be of use in the high futility world if it's done well, but the only benefit for ham radio would be correcting for hearing loss -- in other words, doing what a good hearing aid does. Some ra
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00111.html (7,994 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:57:08 -0600
- Barry W2UP This MAY be of use in the high futility world if it's done well, but the only benefit for ham radio would be correcting for hearing loss -- in other words, doing what a good hearing aid do
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00112.html (8,706 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:33:06 -0700
- Strongly agree, Barry. But second is smooth response, low distortion. Both reduce fatigue. WIDE response is fine, but less important. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-C
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-06/msg00113.html (8,156 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu