Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Antennas\s+for\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Antennas\s+for\s+SO2R\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Antennas for SO2R (score: 1): Author: andrew@exinet.co.za (Andrew Roos); Date: Mon May 26 17:44:23 2003; Hi All I'm new to contesting, a few of you may have worked me in the ARRL international DX CW contest or in CQWW WPX CW last weekend. I used both of these as "shakedowns" of my equipment, plus practi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00250.html (8,216 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Antennas for SO2R (score: 1): Author: ua9cdc@r66.ru (Igor Sokolov); Date: Mon May 26 23:42:32 2003; Andrew, I woud go with 2 el quad with separate feed. Pretty small and better F/B ratio then with 2 el yagi. 73, Igor UA9CDC and soon would and antennas better). seperate; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00256.html (9,485 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Antennas for SO2R (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian); Date: Mon May 26 12:28:16 2003; I'm watching an interesting project develop here in Yuma. W7WW has a big M2 tribander at 70', a 40-2CD at 78', and he will be adding a Steppir Dipole, just below the 40, for so2r. The big question is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00262.html (7,405 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Antennas for SO2R (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones); Date: Mon May 26 21:58:37 2003; The quad is a good suggestion. Actually a 4 element triband quad is a pretty good performer, and the humble 2 element triband quad can do a surprisingly good job. Most of the Force12 tribanders seem; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00272.html (10,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]