- 1. [CQ-Contest] Another logging ethics query (score: 1)
- Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:47:59 -0500
- Another belated posting from NAQP CW. I had a small run going. Worked a guy, but the timing was a tiny bit funny. Next guy, timing was even more off. Sure enough, another station was running close to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00254.html (7,378 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another logging ethics query (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard L. King" <k5na@ecpi.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:11:08 +0000
- The only way to avoid this problem is for the S/P guy to send your call when he comes back and gives you his exchange. It is simple enough to do in CT or Writelog (and probably other software) by jus
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00264.html (8,843 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another logging ethics query (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:20:20 -0800
- IMHO, the question and the problem further illustrate the brilliance of the mandatory NA Sprint format (also used in the NCCC NS and now the 2008 LQP). 73. Rick, K6VVA * The Locust 2008 LQP - January
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00271.html (7,257 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu