Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+identifier\s+for\s+Multiple\s+QSO\s+Parties\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] An identifier for Multiple QSO Parties? (score: 1)
Author: Lloyd Cabral <KH6LC@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 18:36:13 +0000
This past weekend included a multitude of State QSO Parties. This year I was only interested in operating the 7QP. Despite calling CQ 7QP, I was often called by stations in the other QSO Parties. Per
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00011.html (7,289 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] An identifier for Multiple QSO Parties? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 18:15:20 -0300
Hi Lloyd, I am all for improvements and efficiencies in contesting, but I doubt very much whatever you try will work. Why? A goodly number of the folks in these QSO parties are very casual ops. Many
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00013.html (8,530 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] An identifier for Multiple QSO Parties? (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 21:16:41 -0400
Were you calling CQ 7QP from Florida or Hawaii? Calling CQ 7QP indicates that you are operating in-state in the 7th call area. If you are not in-state, you should call CQ 7 and leave off the QP. Even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-05/msg00015.html (9,522 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu