Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+Open\s+Letter\s+to\s+the\s+Radiosport\s+Community\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+An\s+Open\s+Letter\s+to\s+the\s+Radiosport\s+Community\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to the Radiosport Community (score: 1): Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:09:53 -0500; There are 2 important areas that many feel need improving in our sport - 1) The addition of new, young talent into the radio sport community 2) A fairer way of qualifying WRTC competitors There have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00379.html (10,676 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to the Radiosport Community (score: 1): Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:16:24 -0600; There are some *superb* ideas in this write-up, Ed. I think it's worth considering on its own merits regardless of whether it's deemed to fit into the WRTC mission. Two other ideas that might be help; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00382.html (13,554 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to the Radiosport Community (score: 1): Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 02:54:32 +0000; I fully support N1UR's constructive proposal! Well expressed indeed! Hope that we as part of this great community can openly continue discussing different new set ups for WRTC beyond 2018. Of course,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00383.html (17,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]