Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Ambiguity\,\s+again\s+\[was\:\s+ZoneProp\s+REMINDER\]\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 06:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Isn't this just an extension of the "If your wife brings you a sandwich, you better enter as assisted" argument? -- "Assistance" is undefined (or poorly defined at best). Therefore, it is anything th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00751.html (7,189 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:11:25 -0000
anything that your imagination makes you believe that it is. C'mon, people, cutting through all the sophism we each know what the definition really is. -- Definition: "Assistance" is an organized me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00752.html (8,628 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 08:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Case-in-point... How much more "specific" can one be in communicating "VY1JA", "up 10kc" and "just" (who, where, when)? That seems to meet the definition just shared, yet you believe that it does not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00753.html (7,959 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:55:32 -0500
I write: EV, What part of "organized method" do you not understand ??? 73, WA4TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00754.html (8,099 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:59:24 -0800
<snip> "First, meeting on the air during a contest to arrange strategy, compare multipliers, or organize contacts places all participants in the Assisted category in ARRL and most other contests. <s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00757.html (9,330 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:39:10 -0000
My definition (which I think most would chose to say is reasonable) includes the phrase ?organized method?. 73 es GL in the test, de Hans, K0HB -- and "just" (who, where, when)? That seems to meet th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00758.html (10,441 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 19:18:49 -0800 (PST)
I write: EV, What part of "organized method" do you not understand ??? -- I take exception with limiting the definition of "assistance" to include only "organized methods". One can certainly "assist"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00760.html (8,117 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:12:14 -0000
only "organized methods". One can certainly "assist" randomly. And if you are the target of a 'random assist', must you then DQ yourself? If so, I can't wait to hear some of you guys in the next tes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00764.html (8,847 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:08:05 -0800 (PST)
And if you are the target of a 'random assist', must you then DQ yourself? -- If you *act* upon receiving the random assistance (information), then you are no longer unassisted. Like golf, this aspec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00765.html (8,782 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ambiguity, again [was: ZoneProp REMINDER] (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:32:48 -0500
I took a look at the CQWW rules. Guess what - they are >>>incredibly<<< vague! to wit: 1. Single Operator High: Those stations at which one person performs all of the operating, logging, and spotting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00786.html (10,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu