Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+fieldday\s+reports\s+at\s+RBN\s+$reversed\s+beacon\s+network$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+fieldday\s+reports\s+at\s+RBN\s+$reversed\s+beacon\s+network$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL fieldday reports at RBN (reversed beacon network) (score: 1): Author: "Ulli Grunow" <ulli.grunow@ospreyribs.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:00:28 +0200; Dear Hamradio friends contesters and ARRL-fieldday participants, I would like to remind you, that the so-called reversed beacon network (RBN) is a great tool, to confirm, whether your antenna set-up; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00300.html (10,018 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL fieldday reports at RBN (reversed beacon network) (score: 1): Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>; Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:08:32 +0200; Ulli I don´t agree. The figures can not be compared as useful they are. The main factor for signal to noise is the local noise picked up by the different antennas connected to the skimmers and the qr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00301.html (8,042 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]