Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+varying\s+Power\s+levels\s+sent\s+by\s+DX\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 08:56:06 -0400
Wasn?t the rule clearer on this many years ago or is it just me? Reading 3830 & other reports and some comments within my own contest club (MCC) seems I was not alone. On the different power levels,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00123.html (7,511 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 19:30:26 -0500
My experience was the same. I *corrected* a couple, and later thought better of that strategy. Under the circumstances, I don't see how the log checkers can be overly picky about that. -Steve K8LX On
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00125.html (8,646 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <ars.kk0u@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:45:12 -0600
On the different power levels, yes, sometime Saturday I edited 3 (separate) tired/QSB/whatever). After reading 3830, I wonder if we are going to lose a bunch of Qs because we 'corrected' stuff as we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00127.html (7,635 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:02:00 -0500
We'll you're supposed to log what you copy (at least within reason) and they stations you worked should submit their log with the appropriate data. My older version of Writelog would not allow me to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00129.html (8,993 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:26:09 -0700
This seems to get hashed over every year.  From my memory, it has been said to pick a power and stick with it for the entire contest.  Same for your check in SS.  It should be easy for the judges to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00130.html (10,326 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
I couldn't find any place in the rules which said you had to send to same power throughout the contest. Maybe someone can help me with this,. In any case, there may be good reasons for different powe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00131.html (11,106 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:08:49 -0500
Ken, I made no comment that disagreed with your points. I would only say that it's permissible to edit previous contacts if done *during* the contest based on allowable information (i.e. guessing). B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00132.html (11,608 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX varying Power levels sent by DX (score: 1)
Author: JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:33:38 -0600
Or you find out 100 watts isn't that fun so you crank on the amp! I would bet a lot of stations sending K or KW weren't running 1000 watts.  it is just easier to send that than 600 or so. 73 John AF5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00133.html (11,717 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu