Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+Spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+Spots\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: ns3t@arrl.net (Jamie Dupree); Date: Fri Apr 11 09:15:43 2003; While the thread is on spots again, here is some data from the ARRL DX contests. On the CW weekend, there were spots made by 24 US calls that were not actively licensed by the FCC. A second posting f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00209.html (9,501 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Fri Apr 11 13:31:33 2003; This data is next to meaningless to me. Have you ever gone to DX Summit and put out a spot through the web interface? It asks you to type your call in as the spotting station. How many people type th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00215.html (7,772 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: w9sz@prairienet.org (Zack Widup); Date: Fri Apr 11 15:37:52 2003; [etc] Gee, this is a big mystery to me. What is the reason for this? Are there people who have changed callsigns but kept their TNC's set up with their old calls? Are there people connected to packet; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00216.html (8,017 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: w1ebi@lightband.com (George Harlem, W1EBI); Date: Sat Apr 12 00:58:14 2003; For my first posting to CQ Contest, I'll float a question that intrigues me: Every cluster I've signed into has come back to me with a "Welcome, George" the first time I signed on. If the packet syso; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00221.html (9,231 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: n2mg@eham.net (Mike Gilmer, N2MG); Date: Sat Apr 12 08:20:59 2003; and in as of Hell, they cannot even register on eHam with the correct call... However, IMO, what looks like a great number of "bogus" calls being associated with just a few DX stations being spotted; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00230.html (7,750 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT); Date: Sat Apr 12 13:31:13 2003; several reasons... 1. not all nodes have an fcc database 2. not all databases are created equal 3. not all databases are updated daily 4. not all node software checks the database and none that I kn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00234.html (8,375 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: w1ebi@lightband.com (George Harlem, W1EBI); Date: Sat Apr 12 10:23:24 2003; All good points, David. I had not considered DXSummit. Wow, ham radio identity theft. What next... George W1EBI --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00242.html (9,408 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Spots (score: 1): Author: je1cka@jzap.com (Tack Kumagai); Date: Mon Apr 14 20:54:38 2003; If so, you should delete the message(s). I'm interested in them very much. All the messages in the reflector are not meaningfull to everyone. Yah, not 100% but 99.9% or so. Most ops type the worked s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00249.html (7,744 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]