Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+Results\s+\-\s+Did\s+Anyone\s+Else\s+Notice\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: John Crovelli <w2gd@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 16:56:19 +0000
The 2023 ARRL DX CW results show FS/KO1A (IZ3EYZ) winning the SOAB Low Power category over VP2V/AA7V. What caught my eye was a non-US citizen using a US/FCC issued callsign operating from a French po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00081.html (8,650 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 17:31:21 -0400
As arcane as these rules are, I think this may be a case of an innocent mistake and "no harm, no foul".  He is the legitimate holder of KO1A.  Are you suggesting that he gained some advantage? 73, Pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00082.html (10,258 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: "Naumann, Robert, W5OV via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 23:04:47 +0000
John, Please provide any proof that French St. Martin has disallowed this operation. If you have no proof, please stop making false accusations. This is not "My ARRL Voice" where lies are accepted wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00083.html (10,961 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:49:51 +0000
I think it is a legitimate question. ARRL did accept the operation, but your response below doesnt indicate that you had the proof either. We either accept the regulations for amateur radio in whatev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00084.html (12,047 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:29:30 +0000 (UTC)
Implications not withstanding, is there any actual proof that KO1A/IZ3EYZ deliberately intended to violate the rules? For that matter, implications not withstanding, is there any actual proof that KO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00085.html (12,071 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: "Naumann, Robert, W5OV via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:49:16 +0000
Randy, As you and W2GD are original sponsors of that forum, your question is specious. You said: my arrl voice whatever that is ?? Really? As a sponsor of My ARRL Voice, thats what you say? You have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00086.html (14,201 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 14:54:10 +0000
"The reality is that French St. Martin is the only authority that matters here despite claims of outsiders. " and "Unless French St. Martin finds the operation illegal, on what basis should the ARRL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00088.html (16,699 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 03:43:21 +0900
The contest rules say: Entrants agree to follow the regulations of their operating licenses and station licenses at all Times This is regardless of any enforcement. In this case only if French autho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00090.html (16,187 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 19:39:21 +0000
IZ3EYZ was the same gentleman who operated remote illegally using a US station but not being a US licensed operator. He used the US station callsign. The scores were ultimately disqualified in the WR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00092.html (9,926 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:24:37 +0900
ARRL should not be endorsing and encouraging illegal operation. If this operation was in fact illegal (according to the published rules and CEPT regulations) then the right thing to do is to disquali
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00093.html (21,701 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 16:45:37 +0000
I've got to agree with John, Randy, and Mark here. Bob, your response seems very strong, and your immediate mention of My ARRL Voice suggests an axe to grind rather than an open discussion of topic.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00094.html (12,968 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 01:31:13 +0000
its not a false accusation. Its a very legitimate question. Its the same type of crowd sourcing that disqualified someone several years ago from a CQWW contest (not certain which one?). I guess its p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00095.html (14,305 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Results - Did Anyone Else Notice? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2023 19:58:21 -0600
Pretty simple.  It appears that KO1V violated CEPT rules.  Does IZ3EYZ now claim to reside in the USA as a resident?  It is possible that he violated both his licenses with this activation. W5OV- Sin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-08/msg00096.html (14,393 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu