Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s+\-\-\s+disappointing\s+experience\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Art Boyars <artboyars@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:38:22 -0500
In case you didn't read my post on 3830scores.com (and why would you?)... I did Saturday night and a bit of Sunday morning at W3LPL. When I got home Sunday I did one "fresh meat" run on each band, 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00134.html (6,998 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:56:14 -0700
Art et al: I had the same experience during the peaks of the high band openings to EU on both days. Nothing serves as a rate-killer like a bunch of stations all calling on the same frequency over and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00135.html (8,144 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:44:26 -0500
Sending partial calls is frowned upon by the DX Code of conduct: 6. I will always send my full call sign. I have heard that many stations, especially big guns and especially DX, will not respond to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00136.html (9,546 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:46:00 -0500
I would rank most of us below the Japanese when it comes to average operating etiquette, but it's worth remembering that particularly on the high bands callers often can't hear each other, and the "1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00137.html (9,622 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:35:50 -0700
Sorry, Pete, but that's not a valid excuse. I've told this one before, but it's worth repeating for a laugh: Speaking of DXing and callsigns, one time, there was a big pile up on some DX station in w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00138.html (10,996 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Ed Parish <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:11:58 -0500
You misunderstood the post. He is running and can only get part of the call due to QRM. It is quite acceptable to send a partial call and only those with that partial call should respond. Unfortunate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00139.html (11,114 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Tom Hellem <tom.hellem@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 08:03:42 -0700
Pete: Im not really seeing how the stations in EU not hearing each other has anything to do with the problem. Heres a typical exchange: I call cq. A pile of 8 stations responds. I copy DL5 and put it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00140.html (11,620 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:42:34 -0600
I noticed the same thing, and it wasn't just the big multi-ops. Often all about the same strength on exactly the same frequency.  Alas, it seems to be SOP in some parts of the world. 73, Scott K9MA I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00142.html (9,046 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:46:06 -0500
We're Contesters, not DXers. That's why we have no problems coming back to calls like "AR", "GD" or "SS"... BTW, is there anything in that code about blindly clicking on DX spots? Thanks. 73, Yuri VE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00143.html (11,282 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:17:32 -0700
Many times this is caused by RBN/Cluster spots.  This has been going on for a very long time.  Those in the know, know to send up or down just a bit and get worked.  It seems that radios are getting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00144.html (10,351 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:07:22 -0400
We all have to remind ourselves these are GREAT problems to have ! The opposite is having nobody respond to our CQ's because of poor prop.<<<(turn on the time machine and go forward 7 years and then
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00145.html (8,612 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:48:23 -0500
Yeah, I have to say, DX Codes work great in DX pileups. They're kind of different than contests. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00146.html (12,685 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:49:44 -0500
Narrow up your filter and use the RIT. It does work. Or hit Morse Runner for some more practice. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00147.html (13,226 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:46:27 -0600
I don't think Art needs more practice! 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00148.html (9,497 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:06:21 -0500
I believe DX Code # 3. (I will not trust the DX cluster and will be sure of the DX station's call sign before calling) addresses blind clicking. Of course not everyone waits for an ID or maybe they c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00149.html (8,755 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:46:15 -0500
John, In the recent ARRL DX CW I ID'd after each time. Especially when I have long string of dupes. Or whenever someone sends "?". Even sent {HISCALL} de {MYCALL} while replying. Doesn't help those w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00150.html (10,188 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: dimitri cosson <dimitri.cosson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:00:30 +0100
<<<I don't think Art needs more practice!>>> everybody need more practice ! Why do you think that guys like Dan, N6MJ, and others are still doing hard practice sessions with Morse runner ?... 73, Dim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00152.html (10,216 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:43:43 -0600
On many occasions during ARRLDXCW I was using my FT1000MP with a PAIR of 250khz filters and then adding the Notch filter (manually tuning back and forth), IPO and shift/width (manually tuning back an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00154.html (16,187 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: K3ZJ David Siddall <davek3zj@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:21:06 -0500
Contest logs are made public after adjudication. ARRL CW are at this link: https://contests.arrl.org/publiclogs.php?cn=dxcw 73, Dave K3ZJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00155.html (9,227 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW -- disappointing experience (score: 1)
Author: Steve Wojton NN2NN <swojton@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:33:47 -0500
My two cents While in s&p mode, generally if the DX does not give their callsign in two exchanges while Im copying, I move on my score be damned! Steve NN2NN Sent from my iPhone _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-02/msg00157.html (11,084 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu