- 1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: rfpwr@linknet.net (Chas)
- Date: Sun Jun 14 09:00:29 1998
- The rumors of my retirement from radio are premature. Just been too busy to operate or post to the reflector. I still read the reflector periodically, to keep up with the goings on. My last activity
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00065.html (8,296 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: RThompson@factorysoft.com (Randy Thompson)
- Date: Sun Jun 14 14:59:20 1998
- I too had the same misfortune of being left out of the 10M contest results. My score wasn't significant in any way (except to me!). Even funnier, I got two confirmations from ARRL that they had recei
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00067.html (8,029 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Mon Jun 15 11:50:11 1998
- Surely, it should be elementary to compare the list of logs received against the to-be-published results before they go to press? Of course, that assumes that they maintained a list of logs received
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00071.html (7,479 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: RThompson@factorysoft.com (Randy Thompson)
- Date: Sun Jun 14 14:59:20 1998
- I too had the same misfortune of being left out of the 10M contest results. My score wasn't significant in any way (except to me!). Even funnier, I got two confirmations from ARRL that they had recei
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00280.html (8,037 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Mon Jun 15 11:50:11 1998
- Surely, it should be elementary to compare the list of logs received against the to-be-published results before they go to press? Of course, that assumes that they maintained a list of logs received
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00284.html (7,460 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu