Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+voice\s+of\s+reason\s+among\s+the\s+din\s+of\s+accusations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+voice\s+of\s+reason\s+among\s+the\s+din\s+of\s+accusations\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] A voice of reason among the din of accusations (score: 1): Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:52:42 -0400; Wow! A voice of logic and reason in this cacophony of "Disqualify - they're breaking the rules" crowd! I'm absitively impressed! Astounded! Amazed! Will wonders never cease??? Congratulations! But, m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00112.html (12,560 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] A voice of reason among the din of accusations (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:45:00 -0700; Thanks for the morning chuckle. You laud John's post as "the voice of logic and reason" and then go on to strongly criticize both the rule and those who wrote it. And I too am astounded and amazed. F; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00113.html (14,925 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]